BEING MORE CERTAIN ABOUT RANDOM ASSIGNMENT IN SOCIAL POLICY EVALUATIONS
Saved in:
STAFFORD, B., BEING MORE CERTAIN ABOUT RANDOM ASSIGNMENT IN SOCIAL POLICY EVALUATIONS. SOCIAL POLICY AND SOCIETY, Vol. 1, no. 4 (2002), p. 275-284.
Ref.
116563
Location:
SIIS R.1690 Archivo
Palabras clave:
Crítica, Evaluación de servicios, Métodos de evaluación, Política social, Teoría, Reino Unido, EE.UU.
Crítica, Evaluación de servicios, Métodos de evaluación, Política social, Teoría, Reino Unido, EE.UU.
Similar Items: BEING MORE CERTAIN ABOUT RANDOM ASSIGNMENT IN SOCIAL POLICY EVALUATIONS
- WHEN TOTAL RANDOMIZATION IS IMPOSSIBLE. NESTED RANDOMIZED ASSIGNMENT
- Randomization and social policy evaluation revisited
- CASE ASSIGNMENT IN AGRAMMATISM
- RANDOM ASSIGNMENT:PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS FROM FIELD EXPERIMENTS
- Impacts of home-care subsidies: Evidence from quasi-random assignment
- MAKING RANDOM ASSIGNMENT HAPPEN: EVIDENCE FROM THE UK EMPLOYMENT RETENTION AND ADVANCEMENT (ERA) DEMONSTRATION