REMAINING OPEN TO QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND MIXED-METHOD DESIGNS: AN UNSCIENTIFIC COMPROMISE, OR GOOD RESEARCH PRACTICE?. EN: INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN MENTAL RETARDATION
Đã lưu trong:
MCVILLY, K.R., ET AL., REMAINING OPEN TO QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND MIXED-METHOD DESIGNS: AN UNSCIENTIFIC COMPROMISE, OR GOOD RESEARCH PRACTICE?. EN: INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN MENTAL RETARDATION. SAN DIEGO, ACADEMIC PRESS, 2008, 151-203 p.
Ref.
150729
Vị trí:
SIIS M11.1.186
Palabras clave:
Discapacidad, Investigación, Literatura científica, Metodología
Discapacidad, Investigación, Literatura científica, Metodología
Những quyển sách tương tự: REMAINING OPEN TO QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND MIXED-METHOD DESIGNS: AN UNSCIENTIFIC COMPROMISE, OR GOOD RESEARCH PRACTICE?. EN: INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN MENTAL RETARDATION
- How good are your counterfactuals? Assessing quantitative macro-comparative welfare state research with qualitative criteria
- QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE METHODS:IS THERE AN ALTERNATIVE?
- UNSCIENTIFIC DOCUMENTATION AND PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES: A REJOINDER TO CARBO
- THE EUROPEAN EMPLOYMENT STRATEGY: EXISTING RESEARCH AND REMAINING QUESTIONS
- IMPLICATIONS OF GENDER FOR ALCOHOL TREATMENT RESEARCH: A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE REVIEW
- 'FINDING A GOOD THING': THE USE OF QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE METHODS TO EVALUATE AN EXERCISE CLASS AND PROMOTE EXERCISE FOR ADULTS WITH MOBILITY IMPAIRMENTS