WHAT DO WE KNOW? WHAT SHOULD WE DO? MELDING RESEARCH VALIDITY AND RHETORIC IN THE ANALYSIS OF POLICY MAKING
Bewaard in:
PEARSON, M., WHAT DO WE KNOW? WHAT SHOULD WE DO? MELDING RESEARCH VALIDITY AND RHETORIC IN THE ANALYSIS OF POLICY MAKING. EVIDENCE AND POLICY, Vol. 6, no. 1 (2010), p. 77-90.
Ref.
174894
Plaats:
SIIS R.1864 Archivo
Palabras clave:
Crítica, Diseño, Literatura científica, Planificación, Políticas públicas, Toma de decisiones, Validez
Crítica, Diseño, Literatura científica, Planificación, Políticas públicas, Toma de decisiones, Validez
Gelijkaardige items: WHAT DO WE KNOW? WHAT SHOULD WE DO? MELDING RESEARCH VALIDITY AND RHETORIC IN THE ANALYSIS OF POLICY MAKING
- The funding of long-term care in Canada: What do we know, what should we know?
- Carers, choice and personalisation: what do we know?
- HOW IDEOLOGY SHAPES THE EVIDENCE AND THE POLICY: WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT CANNABIS USE AND WHAT SHOULD WE DO?
- INTRATHECAL BACLOFEN AND SPASTICITY: WHAT DO WE KNOW AND WHAT DO WE NEED TO KNOW?
- WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AS AN ANTIPOVERTY STRATEGY: WHAT DO WE KNOW? WHAT SHOULD WE DO? EN: CHANGING POVERTY, CHANGING POLICIES
- MANAGING CHILD WELFARE AGENCIES: WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT WHAT WORKS?