Explicit argumentatin as a supervisory tool for decision making in child protection cases involving human rights issues
Saved in:
Duffy, J., Explicit argumentatin as a supervisory tool for decision making in child protection cases involving human rights issues. Practice, Vol. 23, no. 1 (2011), p. 31-44.
Ref.
179595
Location:
SIIS R.852 Archivo
Palabras clave:
Control, Derechos humanos, Menores, Protección de menores, Recomendaciones, Toma de decisiones, Trabajo social
Control, Derechos humanos, Menores, Protección de menores, Recomendaciones, Toma de decisiones, Trabajo social
Similar Items: Explicit argumentatin as a supervisory tool for decision making in child protection cases involving human rights issues
- Explicit references to older people in human rights law
- FAMILY INVOLVEMENT IN DECISION MAKING IN CHILD PROTECTION AND CARE: FOUR TYPES OF CASE CONFERENCE
- ISSUES IN HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUALLY DISABLED PERSONS
- CLAIMING RIGHTS: DISABILITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS. EN: MORALS, RIGHTS AND PRACTICE IN THE HUMAN SERVICES. EFFECTIVE AND FAIR DECISION-MAKING IN HEALTH, SOCIAL CARE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
- Child protection practitioners and decision-making tools: observations and reflections from the front line
- Complexity theory and child protection and welfare: A tool of hindsight and/or a tool to assist improved decision making in child protection and welfare work