Should randomised controlled trials be the "gold standard" for research on preventive interventions for children?
I tiakina i:
Stewart-Brown, S., ET AL., Should randomised controlled trials be the "gold standard" for research on preventive interventions for children?. Journal of Children's Services, Vol. 6, no. 4 (2011), p. 228-235.
Ref.
183816
Tauwāhi:
SIIS R.1791 Archivo
Palabras clave:
Estudio cualitativo, Infancia, Intervención familiar, Menores, Métodos de evaluación, Métodos de investigación, Padres, Participación familiar, Programas de prevención, Reino Unido
Estudio cualitativo, Infancia, Intervención familiar, Menores, Métodos de evaluación, Métodos de investigación, Padres, Participación familiar, Programas de prevención, Reino Unido
Ngā tūemi rite: Should randomised controlled trials be the "gold standard" for research on preventive interventions for children?
- METHODOLOGICAL STANDARDS FOR RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF INTERVENTIONS FOR PREVENTING RECURRENCE OF CHILD PHYSICAL ABUSE AND NEGLECT
- RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS (PARTS 1 OF 2)
- Gold Standards Framework
- Attributing outcomes to social policy interventions. 'Gold standard' or 'fool's gold' in public policy and management?
- Recruitment and consent of women with intellectual disabilities in a randomised control trial of a health promotion intervention
- Trials and tribulations: challenges and prospects for randomised controlled trials of social work with children