The role of evidence and the expert in contemporary processes of governance: The case of opioid substitution treatment policy in England
Saved in:
Duke, K., Thom, B., The role of evidence and the expert in contemporary processes of governance: The case of opioid substitution treatment policy in England. International Journal of Drug Policy, Vol. 25, no. 5 (2014), p. 964-971.
Ref.
200043
Location:
SIIS R.1114 Archivo
Palabras clave:
Drogas ilegales, Drogodependencias, Fundamentos, Metadona, Objetivos, Opiáceos, Programas de desintoxicación, Programas de mantenimiento, Reducción de daños, Reforma, Tratamiento médico, Reino Unido
Drogas ilegales, Drogodependencias, Fundamentos, Metadona, Objetivos, Opiáceos, Programas de desintoxicación, Programas de mantenimiento, Reducción de daños, Reforma, Tratamiento médico, Reino Unido
Similar Items: The role of evidence and the expert in contemporary processes of governance: The case of opioid substitution treatment policy in England
- The impact of misuse and diversion of opioid substitution treatment medicines: evidence review and expert consensus
- DOSE EQUIVALENTS IN OPIOID SUBSTITUTION TREATMENT
- EFFECT OF OPIOID SUBSTITUTION THERAPY ON ALCOHOL METABOLISM
- Long-term self-treatment with methadone or buprenorphine as a response to barriers to opioid substitution treatment: the case of Sweden
- OPIOID SUBSTITUTION THERAPY IN PRISONS: REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE
- The extent of misuse and diversion of medication for opioid substitution treatment: a review and expert opinions