STABILITY VERSUS FLEXIBILITY. PURCHASERS WANT FLEXIBLE SERVICES AND CONTRACTS, BUT PROVIDERS NEED FINANCIAL STABILITY AND WANT TO KNOW WHAT TO EXPECT
Saved in:
SAWYER, L., STABILITY VERSUS FLEXIBILITY. PURCHASERS WANT FLEXIBLE SERVICES AND CONTRACTS, BUT PROVIDERS NEED FINANCIAL STABILITY AND WANT TO KNOW WHAT TO EXPECT. COMMUNITY CARE, no. 990 (1993), p. 21-21.
Ref.
36836
Location:
SIIS R.399
Palabras clave:
Contratos, Crítica, Organización de servicios, Organización y gestión, Protección social, Sector público, Sector privado, Servicios sociales, Reino Unido
Contratos, Crítica, Organización de servicios, Organización y gestión, Protección social, Sector público, Sector privado, Servicios sociales, Reino Unido
Similar Items: STABILITY VERSUS FLEXIBILITY. PURCHASERS WANT FLEXIBLE SERVICES AND CONTRACTS, BUT PROVIDERS NEED FINANCIAL STABILITY AND WANT TO KNOW WHAT TO EXPECT
- FLEXIBLE CONTRACTING? ECONOMIC CULTURES AND IMPLICIT CONTRACTS IN SOCIAL CARE
- MANY LOCAL AUTHORITIES TRY TO CREATE A COMPETITIVE MARKET BASED ON PRICE, BUT PROVIDERS WANT MORE CO-OPERATION AND INVOLVEMENT. THE KNACK IS KNOWING WHEN COMPETITION WILL ACHIEVE THE BEST RESULTS AND WHEN CO-OPERATION WILL
- What people want out of ed-of-life care: is the social contract failing?
- Counting the cuts. What the Government doesn't want the public to know
- THE FLEXIBLE TRENDS
- LOCATING THE INSPECTION FUNCTION IN RELATION TO PURCHASERS AND PROVIDERS