SOCIAL ROLE VALORIZATION IS TOO CONSERVATIVE. NO, IT IS TOO RADICAL
Saved in:
WOLFENSBERGER, W., SOCIAL ROLE VALORIZATION IS TOO CONSERVATIVE. NO, IT IS TOO RADICAL. DISABILITY AND SOCIETY, Vol. 10, no. 3 (1995), p. 365-367.
Ref.
46154
Location:
SIIS R.743 Archivo
Palabras clave:
Concepto, Crítica, Discapacidad, Normalización
Concepto, Crítica, Discapacidad, Normalización
Similar Items: SOCIAL ROLE VALORIZATION IS TOO CONSERVATIVE. NO, IT IS TOO RADICAL
- VALUING THE PERSON OR VALUING THE ROLE?. CRITIQUE OF SOCIAL ROLE VALORIZATION THEORY
- ARE SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS TOO HIGH OR TOO LOW? EN: SOCIAL SECURITY IN THE 21ST CENTURY
- REPLY TO NEWNES'S 'A COMMENTARY ON OBSTACLES IN THE PROFESSIONAL HUMAN SERVICE CULTURE TO IMPLEMENTATION OF SOCIAL ROLE VALORIZATION AND COMMUNITY INTEGRATION OF CLIENTS
- IT'S OUR PROBLEM TOO! CHALLENGING THE EXCLUSION OF POOR PEOPLE FROM POVERTY DISCOURSE
- TOO HIGH, TOO LOW, TOO YOUNG: AN ETHNOGRAPHY OF TEACHERS' CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION DECISIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES
- FEMINIST AND THE WELFARE DEBATE. TOO LITTLE? TOO LATE?