WHAT THEY DIDN'T KNOW MAY HAVE HELPED US: HOW THE SUPREME COURT MISINTERPRETED THE ROLE OF SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS
Saved in:
SIEGEL, P., WHAT THEY DIDN'T KNOW MAY HAVE HELPED US: HOW THE SUPREME COURT MISINTERPRETED THE ROLE OF SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS. AMERICAN ANNALS OF THE DEAF, Vol. 140, no. 5 (1995), p. 386-395.
Ref.
51529
Location:
SIIS R.622
Palabras clave:
Comunicación no verbal, Discapacidad, Discapacidad auditiva, Escuela, Intérpretes, Jurisprudencia, EE.UU.
Comunicación no verbal, Discapacidad, Discapacidad auditiva, Escuela, Intérpretes, Jurisprudencia, EE.UU.
Similar Items: WHAT THEY DIDN'T KNOW MAY HAVE HELPED US: HOW THE SUPREME COURT MISINTERPRETED THE ROLE OF SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS
- FEMINIST THEORY CONFRONTS US SUPREME COURT RHETORIC: THE CASE OF ABORTION RIGHTS
- "It didn’t come up on my radar": an examination of students’ orientation toward disability justice in the US
- "ONE OF THE MAJOR PROBLEMS OF OUR SOCIETY": SYMBOLISM AND EVIDENCE OF DRUG HARMS IN U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
- ACCESS TO SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
- SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER TRAINING, TESTING, AND ACCREDITATION: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON
- Justisigns. A European overview of sign language interpreting provision in legal settings