A fresh look at an old question: is pro-poor targeting of cash transfers more effective than universal systems at reducing inequality and poverty?
Guardat en:
McKnight, A., A fresh look at an old question: is pro-poor targeting of cash transfers more effective than universal systems at reducing inequality and poverty?. Serie: CASE n. 191, Londres, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, 2015, 31 p.
Ref.
518234
Localització:
SIIS Archivo
Palabras clave:
Pobreza, Universalización, Criterios, Población diana, Estudio comparativo, Exclusión social, Política social, Prestaciones económicas, Renta de garantía de ingresos, Impuestos, Beneficios, Efectos, Nivel de ingresos, Desigualdad social, Datos estadísticos, Características servicio, Evaluación de servicios, Estudio comparativo, Reino Unido, Italia, Suecia, Francia
Pobreza, Universalización, Criterios, Población diana, Estudio comparativo, Exclusión social, Política social, Prestaciones económicas, Renta de garantía de ingresos, Impuestos, Beneficios, Efectos, Nivel de ingresos, Desigualdad social, Datos estadísticos, Características servicio, Evaluación de servicios, Estudio comparativo, Reino Unido, Italia, Suecia, Francia
Ítems similars: A fresh look at an old question: is pro-poor targeting of cash transfers more effective than universal systems at reducing inequality and poverty?
- A fresh look at an old question: is pro-poor targeting of cash transfers more effective than universal systems at reducing inequality and poverty?
- Social transfers and child poverty in European countries: pro-poor targeting or pro-child targeting?
- No strings attached: the behavioral effects of U.S. unconditional cash transfer programs
- The labor market impacts of universal and permanent cash transfers: evidence from the Alaska Permanent Fund
- The long run impact of cash transfers to poor families
- The long term impact of cash transfers to poor families