RESPONSE TO MATHIAS AND NETTELBECK ON THE STRUCTURE OF COMPETENCE: NEED FOR THEORY-BASED METHODS TO TEST THEORY-BASED QUESTIONS
Kaydedildi:
GREENSPAN, S., MCGREW, K.S., RESPONSE TO MATHIAS AND NETTELBECK ON THE STRUCTURE OF COMPETENCE: NEED FOR THEORY-BASED METHODS TO TEST THEORY-BASED QUESTIONS. Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 17, no. 2 (1996), p. 145-152.
Ref.
50896
Yer:
SIIS R.775
Palabras clave:
Adaptación personal, Discapacidad, Discapacidad intelectual, Inteligencia, Psicología, Tests
Adaptación personal, Discapacidad, Discapacidad intelectual, Inteligencia, Psicología, Tests
Benzer Materyaller: RESPONSE TO MATHIAS AND NETTELBECK ON THE STRUCTURE OF COMPETENCE: NEED FOR THEORY-BASED METHODS TO TEST THEORY-BASED QUESTIONS
- A REPLY TO GREENSPAN AND MCGREW'S NEED FOR THEORY-BASED METHODS TO TEST THEORY-BASED QUESTIONS
- REVOLUTION IN THE THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF INTELLIGENCE
- THEORY AND METHODS OF SCALING
- VISUALLY IMPAIRED CHILDREN AND HAPTIC INTELLIGENCE TEST SCORES: INTELLIGENCE TEST FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED CHILDREN (ITVIC)
- LOW IQ SAMPLES AND WAIS-R FACTOR STRUCTURE
- COMPARISON OF SHORT AND LONG VERSIONS OF THE PRUDHOE COGNITIVE FUNCTION TEST AND THE K-BIT IN PARTICIPANTS WITH INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT